Digital Edition

SYS-CON.TV
Déjà Vu
Déjà Vu

Has it really been a year since the last JavaOne? It seems like yesterday that I was watching James Gosling launch T-shirts into the audience using a trebuchet! What a year it has been. Who would have thought that Microsoft and Sun would come to the agreement they did? Those of us watching the JBoss saga were relieved when an agreement halted overt hostilities on that front. With all of this behind us, we could focus on the next challenge in enterprise computing: Microsoft's best shot at infiltrating enterprise computing, the .NET platform.

The future seems full of opportunities. All the vendors are looking at an expanding market for their products. Given the number of companies that have invested in the technology that we've all come to be passionate about, why should we worry about the new platform that has recently come into being? Though people are sniffing at it, no one is using it for anything serious. Does it really matter that the technology that we depend on is owned and sponsored by a single company? After all, we do have IBM, the perennial anchor in the IT industry, on board. They have invested a lot of resources and have focused a lot in this direction. Surely they are doing this because they see this as the future of enterprising computing. More important, businesses feel secure in the knowledge that IBM is a major player in the market even if the competition is a giant. That platform is new and unproven. From a purely technical perspective, the technology looks inferior in many respects and certainly scalability and performance would appear to be an issue. On the other hand, we have a history of successes, a proven track record that is irrefutable in enterprise computing. To further illustrate this point, look at the number of companies that are offering products and services in addition to IBM. Certainly this competition has to be a good sign, a good indication or validation of the strength of the market. But still, there are some doubts, some nagging points that have raised questions.

The first and most worrisome source of our doubts has to be the seeming trouble that the guardian of the technology has had in remaining profitable. This has led to a number of people in the industry wondering out loud about the long-term viability of the company. Sure the company is cash rich, but how long can it continue to suffer these losses before some drastic action will need to be taken? In a not-so-unrelated issue, our guardian has managed to corral a fairly substantial brain trust and, now, that trust is starting to disperse. Okay, companies do lose key people over time and healthy organizations are able to continue to function. Why should we worry? ParcPlace will survive these setbacks because after all, Java will never amount to anything.

The problem is, ParcPlace (and yes, I do mean ParcPlace) didn't survive these "minor" setbacks and with it, the superior technology, Smalltalk, has again been relegated to obscurity. Although, there are not so many insignificant differences between Sun and ParcPlace as there are startling similarities. Sadly, the Smalltalk community never recognized the threat that Java posed. IBM quickly hoisted the anchor and moved to Java. Though IBM's revenues still continued to grow well after the industry proclaimed Smalltalk to be a has-been technology, its growth was more like that of rocket ship that has blown up just after take-off. Even as this was happening, the feeling in the community was that both languages could coexist.

The reality is that Smalltalk, Java, and the C#/.NET platforms are all very different from each other. Each requires a special set of skills and it takes a special person to be able to work effectively in more than one environment. Consequently, businesses are forced to make a choice between them. More often than not that choice comes down to cost. How much will it cost to deliver business-critical functionality in each of these technologies? As technologists, we understand that the accounting of these costs is less than perfect, but in the end they do work. Once more, the largest portion of the costs is acquiring the manpower required to develop enterprise systems. If manpower is the major consumer of resources required to build and deploy a piece of software, it's also the place where small gains in productivity can offer the largest return on investment.

One of the differences between Sun and ParcPlace is that Sun clearly understands that to really be successful, it needs to help developers be more productive. The realization of this understanding has resulted in Project Rave, Java Studio Creator - a positive step forward. I look forward to seeing more announcements at JavaOne that outline how Sun plans to secure its future.

About Kirk Pepperdine
Kirk Pepperdine has more than 10 years of experience in OO technologies. In edition to his work in the area of performance tuning, Kirk has focused on building middleware for distributed applications.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1



ADS BY GOOGLE
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters

ADS BY GOOGLE

ChatOps is an emerging topic that has led to the wide availability of integrations between group cha...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know ...
Is advanced scheduling in Kubernetes achievable?Yes, however, how do you properly accommodate every ...
As Marc Andreessen says software is eating the world. Everything is rapidly moving toward being soft...
The cloud era has reached the stage where it is no longer a question of whether a company should mig...
The need for greater agility and scalability necessitated the digital transformation in the form of ...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an over...
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting ch...
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Raju Shreewastava, founder of Big Data Trunk, provided a fun and ...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most,...
"Since we launched LinuxONE we learned a lot from our customers. More than anything what they respon...
DevOps is under attack because developers don’t want to mess with infrastructure. They will happily ...
"As we've gone out into the public cloud we've seen that over time we may have lost a few things - w...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Michael Burley, a Senior Business Development Executive in IT Ser...
Sanjeev Sharma Joins June 5-7, 2018 @DevOpsSummit at @Cloud Expo New York Faculty. Sanjeev Sharma is...
We are given a desktop platform with Java 8 or Java 9 installed and seek to find a way to deploy hig...
"I focus on what we are calling CAST Highlight, which is our SaaS application portfolio analysis too...
"Cloud4U builds software services that help people build DevOps platforms for cloud-based software a...
The question before companies today is not whether to become intelligent, it’s a question of how and...